Sunday, December 11, 2016

Assignment 16- Brianna Scott


Educational Reform

By living in the United States, we are all given the right to public schooling, and for that we should be grateful. However, it is not the quality of an education that was intended, or that is expected by parents of the children in our country. If we lived in an imaginary place where every child has equal opportunities and is set up to be successful and has the resources to go to college and get a job and provide for their family then, and only then, we might be able to fix whatever our education system has turned in to. So many people and organizations have tried to come up with ways to fix it and turn it into the great system that it was meant to be, but for the most part they have failed.

One of the ways that the issues have tried to be fixed is what is called the “Common Core.” It was created by privately funded groups in Washington D.C. to set hard-lined standards that would objectively lead every child that went through the public school system to college, or at least the entry level of a community college. This is only the beginning of the problems. If the only standards that are to be met by public schools are enough to get someone to the point of being able to be accepted into a community college, which is a great goal to have, what does it mean for someone aspiring to get into an Ivy League school? Are they not to be pushed to their own limits and have their abilities tested even though the standards of their classes are well below what they are capable of?

By labeling a successful student by what they’ve scored on a test, the common core ignores the many qualities of a human being that cannot be tested. Standardized learning targets lead to standardized testing, which leads to standardized learning. As a junior in high school, I’ve taken more than my fair share of standardized tests. If the goal of a classroom turns into passing a test, that’s just not the way that it should be. You can learn a test all you want, but that isn’t all that a child should get out of their public education. I feel like this concept creates an unhealthy benchmark for both teachers and parents.

Before anyone tries to argue about the fact that this is not required by the federal government, and that you can’t call it an encroachment on state’s rights I need to say that I agree with you. Without looking at the situation and everything that comes with the program, you can say that if there were so many problems with it that it shouldn’t be implemented in the first place. Saying any of these things are just excuses to ignore what this system is doing to the children that live here and are put into the schools that try to validate these policies.

The federal government is not putting these standards into law. Instead, Race To The Top funds have been created by the U.S. Department of Education. These grants offer money to the states that are willing to abide by their standards. Any state that cares about the education of their students is going to want, and need the money that would be provided by such grants. It is said in the requirements that by complying with such requirements they will be granted the money. One of the first listed says “Adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in the global economy.” Sounds familiar, right? Contrary to my own opinion, with all of the technicalities and loopholes included, these actions do not violate the constitution. Basically, if you disagree and don’t do what the government is strongly encouraging you to do, you don’t get money that could be used to improve the resources and materials that are already being used to teach students the way that they already are being taught. I am in no way “against” students being provided with the education that will get them into college and succeed in the professional world, but I don’t feel that this initiative will have a positive effect on that.

One of the members of the committee that was to validate Common Core is Sandra Stotsky, a professor at the University of Arkansas. She has been a leader in the opposition of the Common Core, and actually gave a testimony explaining why she isn’t compelled to sign off on these standards. The basis of her stance is just that these standards aren’t enough. They aren’t developed by the experts on the actual material, and they reduce the level of learning that many schools already have in place.

I’ve been thinking about teaching when I get older. If I can make a positive impact on anyone, especially younger people, then I would do whatever it takes. With the common core, the organic nature of a classroom is taken away. The teaching style of a teacher who has been successful in his or her ways for 30 years has to make a change that has the possibility to lower his or her scores. A teacher’s focus changes to the stress of getting his or her students to certain bench marks in the way that these policies say that they should. Teachers have less mobility in that they lose the flexibility that they had to cater individually to students who might be struggling. It’s almost like they are giving out shirts that are “one-size-fits-all” to every child in America. How could all of those children have shirts that fit them? It’s impossible.

Not directly related to the Common Core, but affected, is the increasing appeal of private schools. The documentary “Waiting for Superman”, released in 2010, follows the stories of parents fighting to get their kids a quality education. Those who are born into the areas that aren’t as wealthy as others often are left in the districts with the lowest ranked schools. These are the families that don’t have the funds to send their kids to better schools. They are forced to gamble their child’s education on the luck of a drawing, raffle or lottery to be able to afford tuition to a charter or private school.

A remarkable person who influences much of the debate in educational reform is Ken Robinson. I really enjoy listening to his TED talks and just feeling the passion that he has for kids and their future. My favorite TED talk of his is called “How to escape Education’s Death Valley.” He compares the fight for education to Death Valley. While it is constantly dry and looks as if it has no possibility of ever showing life, it rained almost 7 inches one time. Because of that, it was filled with flowers in the spring. People thought that it was impossible for life to come out of such a dark place. Successful educational reform IS possible. Even when something looks as dead as it possibly could be, you can change the conditions and make life possible in he darkest of times.


Works Cited

Speech/Lecture

Ken Robinson- “How to escape Education’s Death Valley




Documentary

“Waiting for ‘Superman” 2010




Internet Sources

Race To The Top Federal Grants




A transcript of the testimony from Sandra Stotsky on the Common Core  



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.